Back to top

Student Awards Judging Form

Presenter Information

Scores

Please enter a numerical score for each category, to one significant figure (e.g.,3.2)

Unsatisfactory: 0.0 - 1.0
Fair: 1.2 - 2.0
Satisfactory: 2.0 - 3.0
Good: 3.0 - 4.0
Excellent: 4.0 - 5.0

Abstract

Poster Abstract: Refer to the abstract on the website: Accurate synopsis of poster content; objectives, results and conclusions clearly stated: methods described sufficiently to relate results to conclusions: title a good index to content.

Oral Abstract: Refer to the abstract on the website: Accurate synopsis of talk; objectives, results, and conclusions clearly stated; methods described sufficiently to relate results to conclusions; title a good index to content.

Style

Poster Style: Author's name and poster title clearly legible from 5 m distance. Text legible from 2 m d. Illustrations legible from 2 m and well spaced. Continuity clear and logical. Text sufficient to explain illustrations and to state objectives and conclusions, not excessive.

Oral Style: Illustrations clear and readable; organization logical; presenter confident, poised; response to questions friendly and knowledgeable. Speech neither rambling nor rushed, enunciation clear, maintains interest.

Content

Poster Content: Clearly stated objectives and conclusions, data adequate, analysis and summaries appropriate: illustrations appropriate, understandable, informative.

Oral Content: Clearly stated objectives and conclusions, data adequate, analysis and summaries appropriate; clear distinction between own results and previous knowledge, or idea argued logically.

Originality

Poster Originality: New technique, instrument or idea; new contribution to knowledge, evidently origination with the student.

Oral Originality: New technique, instrument or idea; new contribution to knowledge, evidently origination with the student.

Overall

Poster Overall: Poster commands attention, communicates effectively; author responds unhesitatingly and knowledgeably to questions, in a friendly manner.

Oral Overall: Presentation as a whole was effective, convincing, a professional contribution.

Judge Comments

Judge Identity

Please check your scores and click the "Submit" button. You should be redirected to a Thank You page once your scores are successfully submitted.

Questions regarding judging SFS Student Presentation Awards should be directed to Peggy Morgan (pegrat307@msn.com).

Technical issues with this web form can be directed to the Web Editor (webeditor@freshwater-science.org).