Supporting Evidence: Details
Please limit responses to the following questions to 200 words each and upload in the field above.
1. What are the most important conceptual contributions of this paper?
2. What are the potential broader impacts of this paper, including but not limited to management implications?
3. What was the nominee’s role in developing and implementing the overall project (e.g., idea generation, funding, field work, etc.)?
4. What was the nominee’s specific contribution to the paper (e.g., writing, data analysis, data interpretation, graphics, etc.)?
5. Provide highlights of the nominee’s other contributions as a new investigator (e.g., mentoring students, working with stakeholders, broadening participation in science, public engagement, etc.)? inee’s specific contribution to the paper (e.g., writing, data analysis, data interpretation, graphics, etc.)?
6. Are there additional considerations of which the evaluation committee should be aware (e.g., involvement with SFS, unusual challenges overcome by the nominee, etc.)?